Skip to contentXML sitemap · robots.txt
Main sections
Reading paths
Themes
Perspectives
All research documents
- Human strengths in an AI organisation
- Redesign before rapid workforce cuts
- What should a candidate be able to do with AI?
- Who carries the risk when an agent gets it wrong?
- HR agents meet human judgment
- When AI starts reading and assessing people
- Productivity as room to develop
- From AI tools to HR workflows
- How much AI does HR actually use?
- Employees move ahead of the organisation
- Who owns the agent and the employee information?
- HR workflows become an architecture question
- People as owners of HR systems
- AI on both sides of hiring
- HR needs a place in AI strategy
- Human control in the hiring workflow
- Faster hiring is not the whole value
- People decisions need transparency and owners
- The agent catalogue needs a responsibility map
- HR's path from AI use to organisational transition
- Overriding AI becomes a leadership question
- Personal agents and the organisation's HR
- Permissions and rewards in agentic working life
- When career paths and the content of work change
- Agents doing the work need human owners
- Investment in hiring and demonstrable capability
- When AI-related transition needs explaining
- What happens to judgment when tasks disappear?
- Preserve capability and reshape the work
- Roles change even when people stay
- Map the work, recognise the contribution
- TechWolf-SAP deal & CHRO-CIO gap
- Agentic HR orchestration guide
- Agentic HR architectures & skills deals
- Agentic HR locks in, skills M&A heats up
- Agentic HR architectures advance
- HR AI agents need humans
- Workday Rising: Agentic HR breakthroughs
- Workday Rising agentic HR push
- Workday autopilots + Bersin deal
- Agentic HR: Humans stay in loop
- AI in municipal HR: responsibility starts in the work
- A quarter exposed: distinguish tasks from whole jobs
- Public-service staffing: scenarios create more choices
- SCB's 46 education groups: from tables to a local question
- 15 percent in customer support: learning and quality vary
- Human control needs power to change a hiring decision
- AI capability includes data, leadership and everyday learning
- The AI Act: use cases, responsibility and dated guidance
- When software manages: usefulness, understanding and responsibility
- 26 minutes is self-reported time: separate adoption from benefit
- Social dialogue on AI: skills, influence and working conditions
- AI and the working environment: follow up the relief
- Me and we with AI: better ideas in a bounded experiment
- Agentic AI in practice: early experience needs careful questions
- People stay in roles while the work changes around them
- Task and skills maps become strategic infrastructure
- AI efficiency gains lead to organisational choices
- Better performance can coexist with greater work intensity
- Time saved does not automatically become more output
- A public-service AI experiment needs purpose and judgment
- Recognise learning as part of the job
- AI work has changed. Has the job description?
- Invisible work and the right to challenge AI
- Redesign the work before adding more agents
- An announcement is not general availability
- Public HR needs capability inside the organisation
- Training is spreading. Operational readiness is uneven.
- Swedish social partners: learning belongs close to work
- Municipal HR can build capability together
- Workday autopilots + résumé flood
- Agentic HR tools & skills gap
- HR Tech agents hit production
- Agentic HR wave at HR Tech
- Oracle agentic HR agents launch
- Oracle agents hit HR stacks
- Agentic HR deals & skills split
- Public AI agents & HR redesign
- Agentic deals & readiness lag
- Agentic HR deals & skills shifts
- Latest HR-GenAI News: Tech, Business & Public Sector Updates
- Dayforce Deloitte AI alliance
- Gartner: 30% AI rehires by 2029
- AI boomerang & public HR surge
- AI rebound hits public HR
- A local HR assistant starts with owned guidance
- Sjöbo: include candidate experience in the recruitment workflow
- Umeå: reported benefits still need a measurement plan
- Tjörn: read the benefit calculation and the changed working practice
- Kalmar scheduling: distinguish the baseline from pilot outcomes
- DBT: task speed, quality and organisational productivity are different outcomes
- Denmark: task changes can precede earnings and hours effects
- Swedish AI oversight: an interim mandate already exists
- Plan the work before committing to a headcount target
- Agentic HR: follow the approval boundary into execution
- A procurement route is a starting condition, not an adoption result
- Public HR needs a strategy and usable data beyond fragmented pilots
- Workforce change: separate the employer's statement from an AI explanation
- AI boomerang hits HR again
- Agentic AI shifts to workflows
- Workflow redesign beats AI pilots
- Redesign the workflow and the workforce together
- Make role owners part of AI workforce redesign
- Lidingö and IMY: AI proposes redactions, a person owns disclosure
- Talt: map the care workflow before building the AI service
- Paid work-grounded Copilot: existing permissions and a wider retrieval surface
- Check actual Copilot routing settings rather than a generic cloud promise
- Göteborg’s Copilot Chat assessment shows a real governance debate
- Eneo: shared municipal development and a local service owner
- Helsingborg participates in Sambruk’s shared AI platform
- Helsingborg’s Eneo role description makes service ownership tangible
- Svea: follow project phase, prototype and operating model separately
- Name the actual Copilot tier before comparing access and cost
- Agentic HR gap widens
- Reskilling confidence and internal moves tell different stories
- Track who gains from AI and how their work changes
- Arvika gives staff different rules for public and municipal AI tools
- An HR assistant needs reliable sources and a human fallback
Public datasets and downloads